179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
wells
To:
,
Date:
Wed, 10 Feb 1999 02:56:28 -0500
Subject:
Re: (idm) re: classical (lovely)
Msg-Id:
<4.1.0.67.19990210025546.009b0100@titan.vcu.edu>
In-Reply-To:
<f3dacf32.36bf8745@aol.com>
Mbox:
idm.9902.gz
At 07:54 PM 2/8/99 -0500, DzrtMusic@aol.com wrote:
quoted 9 lines Wow this is going to be my new pet peeve!>Wow this is going to be my new pet peeve! >I was using the world classical because it was the closest translation of what >I could put into thought, and yes it was accurate. Why was it accurate? >Because it works, that's why. When I say, "This kind of music will be the next >classical music" How does that interpret in your mind? Well, if you're the >average native english speaker then you understand what I meant. You >understand that I meant this music will be the next wave of voiceless, vivid, >and lucent music full of texture and deep artistic meaning created by crazy- >headed wild-haired composers.
are we going to start comparing richard james, sean booth, and the like to beethoven and mozart? that's more than laughable. next please. - wells oliver / s0ewoliv@titan.vcu.edu "If you make me look bad, I swear to God, I'll never talk to you again."